Goldilocks and the Three Endings
Some of you have recently become members of the Tiki Team by clicking on my Follow button. Thank you. I like new friends. I also like all my old friends here. So, everyone, kick off your flip-flops, introduce yourselves, and make yourselves at home.
If I haven't already welcomed you to Under the Tiki Hut, I'll do so now. Welcome!
If I have welcomed you, then you got to hear it again. I'm happy all of you are here, and I hope you'll come back and visit often.
On Mondays I blog about writing. Usually it's something a little off the wall or an exercise or a commentary on things we need to be aware of. Rarely will you find any sort of how-to post here. For starters, they're everywhere by writers with a lot more street creds than I have.
But the real reason I choose not to do how-to is because every writer has his or her own way of doing things, especially writing things. If I do post about something particular, it's always what works for me, or how I accomplish something. Maybe it will work for you or maybe it won't. Or maybe it will give you an idea or two of your own to try. Or share what works for you.
Even if I forget to say it, it's never meant as you MUST do it this way.
Today I want to chat about endings. What's worse than reading a story that has you enthralled or caught up in how the plot would resolve or how the hero and heroine would ever get together . . . only to go "what?" when you finish the last page.
Over the past few months I've read several novels. Most of them had full, satisfying endings. Then there were two.
One just stopped. There was barely a climax - don't go there - and definitely no denouement. I wanted to know what happened next . . . and I never did find out. Except for making up my own ending.
The other kept on going and going and going following the climax. But had I blinked, I would've missed the denouement. A good twenty pages, maybe more, all still devoted to how the characters related to one another. The author had spent the majority of the book belaboring these relationships, and why I kept reading, I'm not sure, except the author was highly recommended. The story was finished, done, over, kaput - yet the author still hadn't had enough. I wanted to scream.
I know who these authors are, and I won't read them again, at least not for a long while. There are others on this same list of mine. People obviously like them. Some regularly make the bestseller lists. But I still think they could write better endings. And I still won't read them again.
The ending needs to fit the story. How simple is that?
Don't let yours fall short. Or long. Make it just right.
Like Goldilocks :)
If I haven't already welcomed you to Under the Tiki Hut, I'll do so now. Welcome!
If I have welcomed you, then you got to hear it again. I'm happy all of you are here, and I hope you'll come back and visit often.
On Mondays I blog about writing. Usually it's something a little off the wall or an exercise or a commentary on things we need to be aware of. Rarely will you find any sort of how-to post here. For starters, they're everywhere by writers with a lot more street creds than I have.
But the real reason I choose not to do how-to is because every writer has his or her own way of doing things, especially writing things. If I do post about something particular, it's always what works for me, or how I accomplish something. Maybe it will work for you or maybe it won't. Or maybe it will give you an idea or two of your own to try. Or share what works for you.
Even if I forget to say it, it's never meant as you MUST do it this way.
Today I want to chat about endings. What's worse than reading a story that has you enthralled or caught up in how the plot would resolve or how the hero and heroine would ever get together . . . only to go "what?" when you finish the last page.
Over the past few months I've read several novels. Most of them had full, satisfying endings. Then there were two.
One just stopped. There was barely a climax - don't go there - and definitely no denouement. I wanted to know what happened next . . . and I never did find out. Except for making up my own ending.
The other kept on going and going and going following the climax. But had I blinked, I would've missed the denouement. A good twenty pages, maybe more, all still devoted to how the characters related to one another. The author had spent the majority of the book belaboring these relationships, and why I kept reading, I'm not sure, except the author was highly recommended. The story was finished, done, over, kaput - yet the author still hadn't had enough. I wanted to scream.
I know who these authors are, and I won't read them again, at least not for a long while. There are others on this same list of mine. People obviously like them. Some regularly make the bestseller lists. But I still think they could write better endings. And I still won't read them again.
The ending needs to fit the story. How simple is that?
Don't let yours fall short. Or long. Make it just right.
Like Goldilocks :)
Comments
It's hard for me to bring a book to a close, especially a romantic suspense where you have to 'end' the mystery part and then 'end' the relationship part (with the HEA, of course).
(For anyone interested, a lot of those bits and pieces are now free reads or very inexpensive downloads - details on my website)
Terry
Terry's Place
Romance with a Twist--of Mystery
Terry - I'm laughing because I did the same thing. My first manuscript actually began as a short story and ended up being two novels. Both still unpublished.
Holly - Exactly.
LR - Yes, that satisfying ending is our goal. I'm happy you liked your recent read.
Joanne - I agree about the 'huh' feeling. Glad you like Goldilocks :)
Mason
Thoughts in Progress
Happy Monday, Carol!
VR - I agree. Not all stories have a HEA, but they do need a resolution. And it needs to be true to the story and the characters.
Kimberly - I think most readers are like that.
Jane - Yes! It's bad when it just ends and the ending somewhat resembles the story. But when it just ends and has nothing to do with the story, it's really bad.
Elspeth - I totally agree.
Conda - So true. We either leave them emotionally satisfied or not. And if not, we probably won't see them again with one of our books.
Talli - I usually rewrite mine, too. A few times. But not as many as I rewrite the opening. Happy Monday back :)
Good thoughts here, always!
Angela - Thanks for visiting. I love your daughter's way of thinking.
Helen - Exactly. I often wonder if I missed something. Sometimes I find out I did, but not often.
That said, the endings that bug the hell out of me are the WTF endings... Stephen King has a couple GREAT books that suddenly come up to the 'what the hell was this guy sniffing?' at the end--it is such a disappointment when it follows a really masterfully done main book (IT and Tommyknockers come to mind)
I always have to rewrite my endings a couple times... my tendency is to write too fast at first, then give too much extra... the 3rd ending is where it is finally just right...
Great post!
Once I read a book where it was a suspense book and the ending turned out to be a kind of misunderstanding.
Seriously.
I couldn't believe something like that got published except that it was by a very well-known author who had tons of books under her belt.
Grrrr....
Elizabeth - Yes, it's exactly like that...a broken promise.
Jennifer - Yuk. I'm glad I didn't read that one. But it's so true that well-known authors can do things us lesser mortals cannot. Sigh.
Tiki Team - I like that. Your Team, my Army - we'll take over the world!
I agree with the Goldilocks theory. A story HAS to have a satisfying ending, whether it's happy or sad, the loose ends need to be tied up.
And always a space for Chronos & Co.